Go Attend Spock’s Funeral, Captain!

Let me begin by stating just how sick and tired I am of those who organize events that are more concerned about lining their pockets with filthy lucre than they are about doing something that is right and honorable.

captainkirkSuch is the case with the latest report that William Shatner (aka Captain James T. Kirk of Star Trek fame) bailing on his lifelong friend’s funeral.

Apparently the Captain cannot attend Leonard Nimoy’s (aka “Spock,” as we all came to know and love him) funeral because, well, he agreed to appear at the Red Cross Ball to raise money.

As important as the Red Cross has been to millions, I am more than positive that the organizers would get by this one time without the dear captain’s presence.  After all, the Red Cross has been dealing with death, dying, and destruction for years, and have concluded more than one time that when someone’s time comes to go, it only happens once.

Shatner states that he feels “awful” by not being able to attend.  Yeah, it appears that he is so grief-stricken that he would let his own best friend go to the grave while Shatner makes another buck.

Nevertheless, William Shatner’s excuse is part and parcel of what is wrong with society anymore.  Whereas at one time it meant something to have or be a friend, today it’s all about me, myself, and I.

Friends are not necessarily those who stick by you during times of adversity, or in this case, death.  They are those who stand at a distance while you sink in the mire, or the grave, and mouth “God bless you” in your descent.

Moreover, if those “friends” cannot make a healthy return on their “friendship” investment, then one is even that much more easily expendable.

Yes, Captain, I would feel “awful” too, but for a completely different reason.  Real, true, bonafide friends are extremely hard to come by these days.

In fact, someone has once quipped that if one can go through life and make one or two good friends, then one has done well.

From all appearances, and subsequent commentary after the passing of  Spock, one is left with the impression that you (Captain) and your first officer were real, true, bonafide friends.  But, now you cannot attend his funeral?

Maybe it’s that he was the friend and you, captain, were a schmuck.  If so, how sad that after all these years, those, like myself, who watched you and him on endless reruns, as you journeyed to places where no man had gone before, have been misled into thinking you were one of the good guys on board.

Well, if that’s case, Captain, then you go right ahead and do your cameo, make your money, and forget your friend.

Please remember, though, that what goes around, comes around.  It’s not a biblical statement, but it is a biblical fact.

And if one cannot show honor at a time when honor is due, then one may rest assured that the dishonorable will receive their just reward when their time comes.

I only wish I could say, “Live long and prosper,” to Mr. Spock, but Spockgiven his lack of testimony as a Christian, those words would ring empty, if not simply untrue.

That said, however, the least one could do, especially if one was as close to Mr. Spock as Captain Kirk claimed to be, he could forgo the money this one time to honor him.

After all, there will be no other times where Spock will relive his life.  There will no more voyages to Vulcan.  And come the time of Captain Kirk’s demise, there will be no reunion with Spock either.

Besides, by attending his funeral and paying him tribute would focus momentarily on something that is desperately needed in a crumbling human society, which is that honor still means something and that it does not necessarily require a big payout in the end.

But, then again, maybe society is beyond the point of no return, where honor is sacrificed for the almighty buck.  If so, then Shatner’s behavior is most understandable, even though in Spock’s own words that would be “illogical.”  And may I add, it is tragic as well.


Filed under Uncategorized

Let’s Talk About the Atheist Jiblin

Recently a rather hostile atheist has taken exception to an article I wrote some time ago pointing out how ridiculous atheist thought is.

His counter argument was to build himself a straw man and then expect me to tear it apart, if I could.

After trying to point out the fallacy of his offering, he then resorted to all kinds of vile name-calling, as is usually the case with some who have no argument, but wish others to join them in their delusional world as if they did.

Fairy TaleNevertheless, to illustrate my point of the straw man he built, I would like to discuss the atheist belief in jiblin.  What?  Jiblin?  Yes.

You’re probably saying to yourself, What in the world is a jiblin?

A jiblin is the magical being that all atheists believe in.  They pray to it in the darkness as it flies around the room in its flying spaghetti, mini-spacecraft.

Jiblin is mostly noted for the kind of magic it performs, because although it likes to make everyone think that it is aligned with white magic, the reality is that it is pink with purple polka dots.

What is really creepy about the atheist jiblin, though, is that it likes to molest little children, unbeknownst to the atheist.  Jiblin thinks it is funny, since the atheist believes that jiblin is really a good magical being.

Atheists have been asked several times about their belief in jiblin, but all they do is stand around with a blank look on their faces, as if they have never heard of such a thing.  That’s okay, though.  We still know they believe in it.  We said so.  And when we say it, then everyone knows it’s true.

You might be saying to yourself, “What?  I have never heard of such a thing in my entire life.”

If that is true, then don’t feel bad.  There is no such thing as a jiblin, just like there is no such thing as an atheist either.  Both are fictional creations; one for the sake of this post, the other through a suppression of the truth by the atheist.

For now, though, lets stay focused on the jiblin creation and how atheists, like the one mentioned at the opening, wish to project on Christians something that they do not believe in, and then expect the Christian to respond to the atheist’s rambling gibberish.

An atheist jiblin is the exact equal of the “magical being” that the atheist assumes is the Christian God.  It does not exist.

A jiblin does not practice magic, nor does it molest little children, and it certainly does not run around behind the backs of atheists making them look silly.  They tend to do a pretty good job of that all on their own.

The same applies to the God of biblical revelation.  He is not a “magical being,” nor a fictitious creation that keeps Christians appeased or entertained.  Moreover, He has manifest Himself in human history, repeatedly, with the greatest manifestation of Himself being in the person of Jesus Christ.

Now, if someone is going to confront the atheist about something that he does believe in, then the jiblin is going to have to be left out of the conversation, mainly because it is not about something he believes.  And if it is brought up, the conversation is going to go nowhere, since the atheist will not have a clue what is being referred to.

The same applies to the Christian and his belief about God.  If the atheist wishes to bring up the subject, then he must ask a question that comports with what the Christian believes, and that particularly from a biblical point-of-view, since it is only by biblical revelation that whatever belief might be held about God can be objectively verified.

Anything that strays off into “fairy tales” and “magical beings” will go nowhere, since projections and straw men arguments about God only engender silence.  And for the atheist to try and push the subject only means he is not willing to engage in sound, reasonable discussion, but to push an irrational agenda that has nothing to do with reality.

The Christian cannot be held accountable for such irrational rambling, no matter how attractive the straw man might appear.

It is something that needs to be remembered in our day and age of militant atheism, where self-refuting fallacy often parades about as objectively verifiable reason.

Where Christians are expected by atheists to waste time dissembling their straw men arguments and disallowed to present irrefutable arguments that show just how ridiculous the atheist worldview is, as well as just how sound the belief in God is, all over again.


Filed under Atheism

21 Coptic Beheadings and No Rapture?

“And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given to them, and the souls of the beheaded because of the witness of Jesus and because of the word of God and those who had not worshiped the beast nor his image and had not received the mark upon the forehead and upon their hand.  And they lived and reigned with Christ one-thousand years” (Rev. 20:4).

Coptic Christian Death MarchOn February 15, 2015, 21 Coptic Christians were marched to their death by beheading at the hands of the insidious Islamic group known as ISIS.

Of course there was all the usual Muslim claptrap by a craven leader just prior to the execution.

If there ever was a time where a rapture should have or could have taken place, it was then.  But, it did not happen.  Why?

Some Christians for quite some time have been taught that just prior to the inception of the darkest period in human history known as the Great Tribulation, they will be whisked away in a Pre-Tribulational Rapture and will escape all the mayhem foretold in the Book of Revelation.

It was something I was taught while attending Bible College and Seminary and have since come to the conclusion that it just does not make sound biblical sense.  Over the weekend, with the diabolical murder of the 21 Coptic Christians, it makes even less sense.

One reason why a Pre-Trib Rapture does not comport with a sound interpretation of Scripture is simply because Jesus preached that the Christian life would entail suffering, which would include, in some instances, unto death.

Upon sending his disciples out into the world as sheep among the wolves he informed them, “And you will be hated by all on account of My name, but it is the one who has endured to the end who will be saved” (Matt. 10:22).

Later, and in direct reference to the coming Great Tribulation period, he would elaborate further upon the idea of Christian hatred and suffering by stating, “Then they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations on account of My name.”

He goes on to give a dire prediction concerning what would happen with many so-called “Christians,” who during that great trial of their faith “…will fall away and deliver up one another and hate one another” (Matt. 24:9-10).

The Apostle Paul, also, repeatedly referred to suffering as a part of the Christian life.  “Suffer hardship with me,” was his plea, “as a good soldier of Christ Jesus” (2 Tim. 2:3).

The Apostle Peter shared the same sentiment when he wrote, “But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed” (1 Pet. 3:14).

The same could be said of James, Jesus’ half-brother, who referred to the prophets of God as further examples of suffering for the faith (James 5:10), as well as the writer to the Hebrews: “But remember the former days, when, after being enlightened, you endured a great conflict of sufferings, partly, by being made a public spectacle through reproaches and tribulations, and partly by becoming sharers with those who were so treated” (Heb. 10:32-33).

Aside from Jesus telling John, “If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you” (Jn. 15:19), we have our opening verse in Revelation 20:4, which demonstrates the unbridled hatred of the world toward Christians: they are beheaded.

Such malicious persecution of Christians is seen elsewhere in the Book of Revelation.

In Revelation 6:9 it is written, “When the Lamb broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the Word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained.”

The Greek word translated “slain” (sphazo) is typically used of the slaughter of an animal.  Interestingly, John uses it of Cain when he “slew his brother” Abel (1 John 3:12 cf. Gen. 4:1-ff.).

During the Tribulation Period Christians are going to be literally “slaughtered” for their testimony about the Bible and their lifestyle.  What took place in Libya with the 21 Christian beheadings is foreshadow of things to come, as the Book of Revelation predicts.

“And in her [the city of Babylon] was found the blood of the prophets and of saints and of all who have been slain [sphazo] on the earth” (Rev. 18:24).

That brings us to the question of why so many Christians, including myself at one time, believe that they will somehow escape the very thing that Jesus and the apostles said was not only a part of Christian living, but is a symbol of one’s testimony about what they say they believe.

Suffering, persecution, and “slaughter” by death have all been a part of the Christian fabric since the days Jesus and his apostles walked the earth.  But now, at least according to some, that is all going away?

Christians may suffer, but when it really gets nasty, all of the sudden they are going to be “raptured” or snatched out of it all, and leave all the gruesomeness to Johnny-come-lately Christians to endure?  I don’t think so.

Unless Jesus was lying and the Bible is found to be untrue, then genuine, born-again Christians are going to be as much of the earthly society of humans during the final, Great Tribulation, as everyone else.

Of course, there will the adamant who will whip out their favorite cherry-picked Bible verses to assert otherwise, and I’ll address those in upcoming articles.

For now, though, suffice it to say that if there ever was a time when a “rapture” should have taken place, and yet it did not, it was on February 15.

Twenty-one Christians went to be with the Lord in Great Tribulation-like fashion.  They were beheaded.

Thankfully, though, they did not die in vain.  They will return with Coptic Christians Beheadedthe Lord (Rev. 19:11-16), and it is going to be a very bad day for those who took their lives in the barbaric manner that they did.

It will be a day when the pagan idol, Allah, will remain silent, as it always has, and those Muslim sycophants will receive their just reward—a one-way ticket to hell and the Lake of Fire.

“And I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it, from whose presence earth and heaven fled away, and no place was found for them…And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire” (Rev. 20:11, 15).

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Let’s attack Derengowski, that “smug son of bitch.” That will take care of the Muslims!

In case you missed it, the Muslims in the past week have set up their own Sharia-based court in Irving, Texas, a University of Texas-Arlington student made up a hate crime story in response to what took place in North Carolina (where three Muslims were murdered by a psycho), and a Muslim sanitation worker in Portland confessed to help fund a suicide bomber in Lahore, Pakistan.

Of course, all of that is just what took place this last week in the United States.  Yesterday and today the Muslims have been busy killing people in Denmark and beheading Christians in Libya.

“All crusaders: safety for you will be only wishes, especially if you are fighting us all together. Therefore we will fight you all together,” an insistent Muslim militant said.  “The sea you have hidden Sheikh Osama Bin Laden’s body in, we swear to Allah we will mix it with your blood.”

What a fun guy.  What a fun bunch.  A total barrel of laughs, don’t you think?

Not PhobicIt would seem that with all that is going on in the Muslim world, in its effort to terrorize everyone into submission, that the last person on the planet who ought to be the target of defamation and vitriol for telling the truth about it all would be—me?

Well, it’s true, nonetheless.  Little ol’ Professor Derengowski, who basically has been black-balled by the academy because he read from the Koran in a public institution of higher learning, is now the object of personal distaste because he also told the truth about Muslim success in a blog article, of all things.

As is typically the case, when a person cannot honestly and logically engage an argument, and he/she is all worked up in a lather, out comes all the personal insults, non-sequiturs, and inane questions to try and cover foaming at the mouth or keyboard, depending on the venue.

For instance, someone wrote me this morning and called me a “smug son of bitch,” as if that is going to cause the Muslims to think twice about implementing the next phase in an Islamic takeover.

I presented five coherent reasons, along with explanations, why the Muslims are having success and I’m “smug”?  Moreover, to personally attack my mother as a some kind of whore or female dog is what kind of rebuttal?

In the same, classy way, the person queried, “Where do you get off calling yourself a Christian?”

So, if I bit at such a question, what would that do to debunk anything I wrote about Muslim success and American apathy and disorganization to combat it?

If I “got off” calling myself an atheist, a Buddhist, or a Denver Broncos fan, would that mean what I wrote earlier was wrong or untrue?

Ironically, the same person who decided to call me a filthy name and question my Christian faith had the gall to then write, “Being a Christian involves more than a knowledge of theology.  It involves humility and respect for others.”

Really?  You mean humility and respect like calling someone a “smug son of bitch” because she cannot deal, once again, with Muslim success amid American apathy and disorganization?

For some reason I always thought that when someone called someone else a s.o.b. in a tone that was something less than inviting them over for Thanksgiving dinner, that that someone was being disrespectful, if not un-Christlike.  I could be wrong, but it just seemed that way.

The fact of the matter is, it is these kinds of fine, upstanding, “Christians” that are running our government, educational institutions, and many of our churches, that are slowly playing right into the hands of the Muslim agenda.

Instead of spending her time taking exception with the ever-mounting lies and distortions being foisted upon the American public, she would rather rail against me telling for the truth about them.

Instead of admitting that Paul is right, and helping him to establish a bigger platform where he could be heard, she White House Islamic Flagwould rather hop into bed with the Muslims to try and smear him some more.  After all, he’s the one doing all the beheading, bombing, and shooting people, dont’cha know.

Nevertheless, I shall let those who know me, as well as what is going on in the real world, decide whether or not I am a whatever.

Because at the end of the day, and regardless of what they might think of me, the Muslims are still cruising right along, singing a song, and paving the way for the establishment of Ameristan, while certain “Christians” sit by writing verbal vomit.


Filed under Uncategorized

Hanna Davis-Sports Illustrated: Confessions Without Conscience

Hanna DavisIn case you missed it, Sports Illustrated has come out recently with another Swimsuit edition of its magazine.

I’m sure someone somewhere knows how long SI has been doing this, but it is really moot to me.

What is problematic is that it seems with each passing year, the women (girls?) are being encouraged to show off more of their assets with less conscience.  This year is no exception.

Adorning the front cover of this years SI Swimsuit edition is Derek Jeter’s (of New York Yankee fame) girlfriend, Hanna Davis.

Hanna is scantily clad to the point where one has to wonder why she put on anything at all.

Who knows?  Maybe next year, whoever the front page model is, won’t.

The justifiable point of objection, which is not shown here for decency reasons, deals with Hanna pulling her bikini bottom down to the level just above her female genitalia.

Unless she happens to be deformed or malformed, then in another quarter-inch, there would be nothing left to the imagination.

What is equally as troubling with all the soft porn verging on hard porn is Hanna’s ignoramus commentary justifying her objectification.

Not only does she not find her pornographic pose “degrading,” she actually believes the reactions are just “silly.”

According to Hanna, “There’s controversy every year, so I think it’s kind of just silly that they’re making it out to be the big thing; I mean it’s the swimsuit issue.”

So, she admits that what she’s done is controversial, but that those who find her kind of controversy objectionable, well, they’re just silly.

By implication she is assuming that she is the opposite of silly by prostituting herself to the world under the guise of simply modeling swimsuits for a sports magazine.

Although some have made the “silly” argument that prostitution has been with us since the dawn of man, anyone who has ever really paid attention to the consequences of prostitution, or simply porn itself, ought to be aware that it does not produce stalwart human beings.

Instead, it ruins them, their families, and their lives.  There is nothing silly about that.

Now, just how smart are you being, Ms. Davis, by admitting of the controversy, but then justifying it by labeling others as silly?

She continued, “There are far more scandalous pictures in the magazine if you open it up.”

This is the old logical fallacy known as the red herring.  Red herring arguments attempt to divert attention away from the main issue by taking a petitioner on a wild goose chase of sorts.

In essence, Hanna is saying, “Hey, look at the other models.  They’re worse that I am.  Therefore, I’m justified.”

Wrong, Hanna.  By going that route, you’ve just admitted that what you did is wrong, and rather than own up to it, you would rather just be “silly.”

Hanna then argues, “It’s a girl in a bikini, and I think it’s empowering; I’ve been hearing it’s degrading.”

Empowering?  Sticking a copper wire into a light socket is “empowering” too, but I doubt you would want to do that.

The fact is, there is nothing “empowering” about prostituting oneself, much less getting oneself involved in any kind of pornographic endeavor.

Instead, it demeans the individual whereby the reputation is wrecked.

At 24 years of age you’re nothing more than a piece of red meat to a bunch of corporate perverts looking to making money off of you, Hanna.

They’re using your air-brushed image for sale to other maladjusted males (and females) who, if they could, would rape you to death and leave you lying in a gutter.

And you don’t find that “degrading”?

Finally, Hanna rationalized, “I think the people who are saying that aren’t feminists, because I think when you’re a woman and you look at that picture and if you overanalyze it as anything more than just a full picture, it’s just silly to me.”

Excuse me, but full pictures of human beings generally do not include tempting other human beings with one’s genitalia, unless of course, that is the intent.

Moreover, it does not take over-analysis to arrive at the conclusion that “sex sells.”

All one has to do is see who is taking one’s clothes off and for what purpose to understand what is going on.

The reality is, there is nothing “silly” about the criticism.

Hanna, like so many like her, did this on purpose, because she knew she could advance her career and make a fortune doing it.

And while there is nothing wrong with advancing one’s career or making a fortune, what is wrong about all of this is simply the lack of moral restraint and discretion on the part of everyone involved with this project.

Again, this has been going on for years, but the lack of realization that what was considered risque years ago is now considered boring and non-progressive today.

That’s why little Miss Hanna had to all but take the bottom part of her bikini off.  Otherwise, she would have been labeled the same, boring and non-progressive, and would have been passed over as a prude.

Unfortunately, the years of “progressiveness” has only served to sear the moral conscience of society.

What ought to be left to the imagination between a man and a woman in a married arrangement is now degraded to the point where nothing is sacred; not even the marriage bed.

With the moral degradation of society, especially the traditional family unit, it cannot succeed.

Degradation naturally leads to strife, chaos, and barbarism.  And there is absolutely nothing “silly” about any of those either.

Given Hanna Davis’ age, maybe she will be around to see the fruits of her pornographic effort.

Let’s just hope that amid the blood, the guts, and the carnage she is not too surprised.

If she is, would some just hand her a copy of the 2015 SI Swimsuit edition and tell her to look and weep?

I’m sure she will understand her own silliness and will immediately feel empowered.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Why the Muslim March Continues to Succeed

pilot-cage-ISISBy now you have probably already heard, read about, or seen the latest travesty foisted upon humanity with the execution of the Jordanian fighter pilot, Muath (Moaz) al-Kasasbeh (Kaseasbeh).

Islamic militants (ISIS) captured him after they downed his plane and the proceeded to burn him alive in a cage.

The imagery was quite gruesome, but then again, it is what many have come to expect from these consistent representatives of Muhammad.

Then, to add insult to injury, they dumped a front end loader full of concrete and rebar onto the cage, crushing the cage and the remains of his torched body.

Nice.  Again, the Islamists make a case for just what their “religion of peace” is really all about.  Vengeance is theirs, says the Muslims; they will repay.

Aside from the execution of a few ISIS prisoners that the Jordanian government had, and perhaps a few others on the way, the fact remains that the Muslim march to global conquest continues.

The spectacle of what is going on with ISIS, though, is a pimple on a camel’s behind in comparison with what it going on with the rest of the Islamic conquest.

Locally, the Muslims have succeeded in suckering the Garland ISD into allowing them to secure a tax-payer funded building, so that they could raise funds, unabated, to eventually prevent anyone from criticizing their religion.

The same cast of deviants then headed down to Houston and successfully pulled off the same stunt.  The only exception was that they did it at a hotel, rather than a publicly paid for building.

In Fort Worth, an imam was allowed to conduct a “blessing” at the Stock Show, which has been traditionally a Christian-based event, complete with Christian prayers, extending back more than one-hundred years.

Then, the terror-sponsoring group known as CAIR, managed to hold a rally Texas Muslim Capitol Dayin Austin.  Texas Muslim Capitol Day it was billed.

Of course, in each successful venture, there was opposition.  Just not the right kind to stop any of it.  But, why?

Over the course of the past few days I’ve sat and pondered possible reasons why the Muslims are being so successful in their campaign.

In fact, there have been a couple of people who contacted me to ask me why I thought they were moving right along with their agenda and no one was able to stop them.

Let me pose five reasons, one of which I have written about before.  None of the reasons are that profound.  They are merely observations I’ve made over the years, as I watch America turn into Ameristan.

5. Lack of genuine political leadership.  It is clear that in the past 30 years political leadership has been on the wane.  To say that so-and-so represents anyone other than him- or herself would be the absolute truth.  Politicians, through their narcissistic actions, have demonstrated time and again that they are not interested in doing what is right, but what is expedient.  They know that no one is going to hold them accountable.  So, like runaway trains, they do as they please, even if that means jeopardizing the safety of everyone, which includes several generations of Americans who have not been born yet.

In terms of the Islamic problem, our political leaders have no guts.  Most of them have swallowed the multicultural lie, which says that regardless of what one believes, then it should be included in the political fabric and makeup of society.  “It makes us stronger,” is a commonly spouted mantra, even though none of them have ever stopped to think just how inane such a idea is.  Because if such an idea was true, then why doesn’t water mix with oil?  Ever wonder why none of our great buildings, all across America, do not have Swiss cheese foundations?  The point is, the Islamic ideal of Sharia and America’s foundational documents do not mix.  It is why the Muslim wants to establish Sharia Free Zones, because even he knows that the two do not go hand-in-hand.  But, because our political leaders are living in narcissistic dream worlds, he/she refuses to listen, and now we have all across America the move toward not just Sharia Free Zones, but a Sharia driven law system.

4. Absence of intelligent rebuttal.  In the past couple of weeks I have had the opportunity to watch the response to the Muslim onslaught up close and personal.  Hundreds of people gathered with their placards protesting the meetings of the Muslims, many of whom had never read the Koran, nor even knew who the proponents were of the tyranny about to be imposed upon them.  None of the protest was truly organized.  ANot Phobicll it amounted to was one big party.  In fact, later in March 2015 another big party is being planned in Austin, and it will amount to nothing more than a lot of rabble-rousing as well.

Unfortunately, big, unorganized, rabble-rousing parties that lack in intelligent rebuttal only serves to move the Muslim cause along that much further.  The news media picks up on what one person told me were the “knuckle heads,” which the Muslims feed upon to make their case.  Knuckle heads who show up on their Harleys, revving their engines and waving their American flags, as they pass by Muslim sympathizers protesting the protesters.  As if the Muslims sympathizers are truly intimidated by such displays of bravado, especially when the Muslims have already won the battle of seizing property and keeping everyone out it, just so they can continue to keep on constructing their plans and raising money to shut up their critics.  In short, a lack of organized, intelligent rebuttal by huge numbers of non-Muslims is helping the Muslims in more ways than one.

3. Muslims have resolve.  While those emotively up in arms about the push to Islamize America scramble about to finger-paint their next placard, and that for no really good reason, the Muslims continue to demonstrate that they have the resolve to do what is necessary to succeed, which is to infiltrate, proliferate, unto a caliphate, one day.  This is something has been going on the past 14 centuries and will continue to do so until there are either no more Muslims or Jesus Christ returns.  There is no non-ending compromise, only temporary appeasements until the Muslims have successfully moved enough proponents into key government and societal positions, whereby laws and customs can be eventually changed.

If one refuses to believe or accept the reality of such a strategy, then all one has to do is look at what has taken place in France, Germany, and Great Britain.  Whereas at one time the Muslim population paled in comparison to the French, Germans, and Brits, now that has all changed, and with that, all kinds of conflict.  The Charlie Hebdo incident is the most recent, with many, many more on the way.  The same is happening in the United States, with a President who seems quite intent on sympathizing with the Islamic cause.  Add to that the absence of genuine political leadership seen above, and the United States is ripe for a Muslim picking.

2. Christians are aloof.  Christians are in a state of apostasy.  There is simply no other way of putting it.  Most do not have a clue what they believe, if they believe anything.  False teachers and preachers inundate pulpits all across America, and bilk millions (billions?) of dollars every week from the naive to the just plain stupid congregationalist, who then turn around and buy up air time to bilk more money from more fools to keep the vicious cycle right on going.  Although some assume that America is a “Christian nation,” Christians and Christianity are constantly under attack by the atheists, homosexuals, and yes, the Muslims, with very little response.

It is because too many are enamored by the Joel Osteen, T. D. Jakes, and John Hagee types that those same “Christians” do not have a clue what is going on with the Muslim takeover.  All they know is that if something really bad happens, then Jesus is coming back to take everyone away on a cloud, and poof!  Praise Jesus!  Little do they realize that such naivete will only serve to foster one of three choices one day, should the Muslim trek to victory continue.  One, the “Christian” will convert to Islam.  Two, the “Christian” will become a dhimmi and pay a poll tax to his Muslim oppressor.  Three, the “Christian” will fight to the death.  Now, can you just imagine what Osteen, Jakes, or Hagee will respond like, when that day comes?

1. Americans are apathetic.  I’ve written on this before and the same still holds true today.  Although one might add that, as goes the church, so goes society, it still really boils down to the fact that most Americans just don’t care about what is going on around them.  That would include all the so-called protesters that show up at these Muslim rallies.  One person recently wrote, despite all that the Muslims are doing, they will never take over Texas, because the Texans will not let them.  Really?  Above, I’ve listed four events that the Muslims have held in the past month, in the great State of Texas, and very little, if anything was done to stop any of it.  The fact is, Muslims are having a heyday in Texas, right under the Texan’s noses and they are doing it with no appreciable resistance.

Some have suggested that if push comes to shove, then Americans will resort to vigilante action to stop the Muslim incursion.  Well, that might be true to a certain extent, but one must remember, if Muslim history and strategy hold true, then that kind of rebellion has been dealt with before by the Muslims.  It is why Saudi Arabia is strictly a Muslim nation without competitors.  Again, the pattern is infiltrate, proliferate, and then caliphate.  Right now, the Muslims are somewhere between infiltrate and proliferation, with more and more of them holding political offices, while others are gaining sympathy from stupefied city, county, and state bowing to mecca - u.s capitolofficials.  Regardless, the majority of Americans just do not care, which will lead to their demise.

So, there you have it, for what it is worth.  It does not need to be this way, but it is.  The Muslims are having great success at subverting society, and because so many are either asleep, ignorant, gutless, aloof, or apathetic.  Therefore, they will continue right on doing what they are doing.  There are certain steps that could be taken which would halt the onslaught, but I doubt anyone would really want to know about those, so I’ll simply stop here.  Enjoy your freedom.  It is quickly coming to an end.


Filed under Islam

What’s wrong with Bud Kennedy’s Muslim apologetic over the Fort Worth Stock Show & Rodeo?

Bud Kennedy

Bud Kennedy

In Thursday’s edition of the online Fort Worth Star-Telegram, columnist Bud Kennedy gave a scathing denouncement of those who opposed this past week’s “blessing” given by Muslim Imam Moujahed Bakhach at the Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo (hereafter FWSSR).

Included in that denunciation was what amounted to a Muslim apologetic where he argues for Islamic inclusion based on some rather absurd and faulty premises leading to his conclusion, which is that regardless of what one believes, then it should be allowed at the rodeo, if not in Texas.  Really?

What Bud argued amounts to the typical ignorance one gets from the media these days, as well as from those running the FWSSR.  Interestingly, when Stock Show officials were petitioned to post the Imam’s “blessing,” they refused.  It apparently was just sooooooo inclusive and “blessed” that it could not be posted.

Kennedy opens his piece by writing, “Nothing should divide us from our fellow Texans.”  Is that right?  Nothing?  So, if our “fellow Texans” are involved in lying, cheating, rape, murder, incest, among other attributes recorded and condoned in the Koran and Hadith, then that should not divide us, Mr. Kennedy?

It does not take a juris doctor from any one of the outstanding Texas law schools to figure out that those tawdry behaviors not only divide a city, but a state and a nation as well.  In fact, they destroy them.  Nevertheless, let us continue on with more of Mr. Kennedy’s profound wisdom.

Fort_Worth_Stock_Show_&_Rodeo_2015He wrote, “Not race, not faith, and definitely not the theology of rodeo prayers.”

Excuse me, but, when an Imam’s worldview advocates the extermination of the Jews, a “faith” that is narcissistic to the hilt, and a theology that completely contradicts what Jesus, the apostles Paul, Peter, John, Jude, et al, said or wrote, as well what the rest of the Bible states—which is the foundational document upon which our most basic law, the U. S. Constitution, is based upon—you do not think that that is going to divide a people, Mr. Kennedy?

Kennedy continues, “If we learned anything from that movie about an American hero, it’s that we are passionate about freedom. That includes the freedom of 500,000 peaceful Texas Muslims.”

Assuming that he is referring to the recent release of American Sniper, Kennedy’s comments are beneath contempt.

Chris Kyle was passionate about freedom in the sense that he had no qualms about eliminating those “peaceful…Muslims” intent on undermining that freedom.

No Muslim worth his camel pee gives a flip about American freedom, except to replace it with Shariah Law.

Therefore, how dare Bud Kennedy even mention someone like Chris Kyle and the contemptible religion of Islam—which has a long history of aberrant doctrine and treacherous fatwas, all designed to place non-Muslims, Jews, and Christians in bondage, if not simply put to death—in the same sentence!

Kennedy ramps up his irrational diatribe one tick by writing, “Yet some now stir hatred and division, just over an imam’s rodeo invocation.”Moujahed_Bakhach

Excuse me, Bud, but until you actually learn a little history and Islamic doctrine, as well as have the guts to post the content of the Imam’s “invocation,” then you are in no position to be pointing fingers and making accusations about “hatred and division.”  If anything, Bud, you are the epitome of the very thing you accuse others.

“Look, there’s always praying at the rodeo. This year, it reflects Fort Worth,” Kennedy rationalizes.

There are two major faux pas in this latest line of misleading drivel.

First, as the FWSSR official sneakily attempted to slip past everyone, this was not a “prayer.”  It was a “blessing.”  So, in his mind, that made it okay, even though such a “blessing”—simply because of its Islamic worldview—completely contradicts everything Americans have fought and died for the past 200+ years.

Second, it is irrelevant whether there has been praying at the rodeo or not.  What matters is whether that prayer is consistent with what rodeo-goers have subscribed to since the inception of the celebration.

Advocating Islamic jihad, child molestation between a 53-year-old pervert and a 9-year-old girl, and the murder and annihilation of the Jews, among other perversions and atrocities, have never been a part of that celebration or tradition.

So, Bud, this year’s inclusion of those very things by stealth, no less, does not “reflect Fort Worth.”

Instead, it reflects stupidity on the part of some Fort Worth columnists and governors of the event, who have becomes pawns in the hands of the Muslim intent on eradicating the celebration, if not the tradition.

And given enough time, the Muslim will eradicate both the Fort Worth columnists, and those misguided elitists who have been wooed to sleep, as well.


Fort Worth Stock Show & Rodeo Facebook entry

After committing the fallacy of selectively quoting others who join in with Bud’s blind stupidity, he inserts another jab by writing, “But the same people who always gripe now are griping about the prayer.”

Once again, Bud, get your terminology right.  It wasn’t a “prayer”; it was a “blessing,” remember?

Since Bud, and his cronies, believes he is “spot on,” let him explain the difference, or why the FWSSR official used his own form of Muslim taqiyya (deception) to try and fool the public on that one.

That said, what needs to happen is more people gripe about this kind of thing, until the lying and deception ceases.

Nevertheless, it is because too many are engaged in lying and deception that this kind of thing ever happened in the first place.

And the Bud Kennedy’s of the world place their own “blessing” upon all the swill by attacking those who oppose it.

So, who is really at fault or the problem here?  Those doing the griping about the lying and deception OR those doing the lying and the deceiving, and newspapers columnists paid to write in defense of the latter?

Kennedy observed, “As of late Thursday, the rodeo’s Facebook page had 600 comments, many bigoted and unprintable.”

While it is granted that some of the comments were uninformed or in poor taste, after reading Bud Kennedy’s comments here, as well as many of those offered by the FWSSR official justifying all the deception, once again, is it those doing the protesting that are the problem, or those behind all the deception and poor judgment that is the problem?

That said, what about all the comments that make it clear what the Muslims are genuinely up to, Bud?  Were none of those worth mentioning amid your let’s hold hands and sing kumbaya fantasy world of religious pluralism, whereby you believe the Islamist is willing to always play?

After another irrelevant appeal, where Bud quotes a Roman Catholic priest erroneously stating the ungodly mantra, “We are all God’s children,” or something that even contradicts Islamic doctrine, Kennedy closes by writing, “Just say those rodeo cowboys need all kinds of blessings.”

Wrong, Bud.  No one, including the Muslims, needs an Islamic “blessing.”  Why?  One more time, because of what Islam has taught and stood for, for the past 14 centuries!

Islam is a cancer, not a cure, where women become second-class citizens, and all non-Muslims either die, are forced to submit to Islam, or are subject to dhimmitude.

Dhimmitude is forced subjection to Islamic leadership under Shariah Law for all non-Muslims who qualify, whereby he/she receives protection in exchange of payment of an annual poll-tax (the Jizyah) in pure gold.

Add to the blasphemy taught within the pages of the Koran and Hadith, the Islamic_beheadingsavage butchery seen on a daily basis, around the world, where people are either blown to bits or hacked to death, and there is not one cowboy around stupid enough to say, “Come bless me, Imam.”

Instead, that cowboy would put down his rope and pick up his sniper rifle, and do his best to excise the cancer before it excised him, his buddies, his family, and his country.

And after this year’s “sniper” attack by FWSSR officials, and the Muslim community at large, there needs to be a whole bunch of cowboys that need to step up and take back their stock show and rodeo, lest they lose their long and proud tradition to a bunch of politically correct hacks who are all too eager to join hands with those whose global desire is to impose their culture and laws upon everyone, with one of those hacks being Bud Kennedy.

Here’s hoping those cowboys make that corrective step before it is really too late!


Filed under Uncategorized